Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady

Together with

The Federal Reserve announced its decision to maintain the federal funds rate at a range of 4.25% to 4.5%, defying pressure from President Donald Trump for an immediate rate cut. This marks the third consecutive meeting where the Fed has opted to hold rates steady, signaling a cautious approach as it navigates a complex economic landscape shaped by Trump’s aggressive tariff policies, rising inflation risks, and a resilient yet uncertain labor market. The Fed also signaled a single interest rate cut for 2025, a conservative projection reflecting heightened uncertainty. This post explores the implications of this decision for financial markets, draws lessons from historical Fed missteps, highlights why this pause is a prudent move given global uncertainties, and notes the potential market impact of a teased trade deal from Trump.

Market Implications of the Fed’s Decision
The Fed’s decision to hold rates steady has immediate and far-reaching implications for financial markets, as it shapes borrowing costs, investor sentiment, and asset valuations. By maintaining rates at 4.25% to 4.5%, the Fed is signaling that it prioritizes combating inflation over stimulating growth, especially as Trump’s tariffs— including a 10% global import tax and 145% duties on Chinese goods— threaten to reignite price pressures. The central bank’s statement noted that “the risks of higher unemployment and higher inflation have risen,” and uncertainty about the economic outlook has “increased further,” pointing to a potential stagflationary scenario where growth slows while prices rise.

Equities: Stock markets, already volatile due to tariff-related disruptions, reacted with mixed sentiment. The S&P 500 ended higher after wild swings, reflecting relief that the Fed did not signal tighter policy but also unease about the lack of immediate rate relief. Investors fear that sustained high rates could dampen corporate earnings, particularly for import-heavy sectors like retail and manufacturing, as tariffs raise input costs. Companies like McDonald’s, General Motors, and Apple have warned of earnings hits, and airlines like Delta have scrapped forecasts altogether. However, retail investors have remained net buyers for 21 weeks, a record streak, providing some market buoyancy.

Bonds: Treasury yields ticked higher as traders pared back expectations for near-term rate cuts, with markets now pricing in a July 2025 start for easing, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool. Higher yields reflect the Fed’s hawkish stance on inflation, which could pressure bond prices and increase borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, and corporate debt. This could further strain consumer spending, which slowed to 1.8% growth last quarter from 4%.

Currencies and Commodities: The U.S. dollar edged higher, bolstered by the Fed’s steady rates and the prospect of prolonged high yields, making it bullish for the USD in currency markets. Gold, despite a historic run above $3,000 in 2025, faces headwinds as higher rates reduce the appeal of non-yielding assets. Meanwhile, tariff-driven supply chain disruptions could push commodity prices, particularly for metals and energy, higher, adding to inflationary pressures.

Market Sentiment: The Fed’s acknowledgment of a “resilient” economy but “heightened uncertainty” has left markets in a state of cautious equilibrium. Investors are grappling with the dual risks of inflation and slower growth, with some analysts warning of “choppy” markets into the second half of 2025. The Fed’s signal of only one rate cut this year—down from earlier projections of two to four—suggests a prolonged period of elevated borrowing costs, which could temper bullish sentiment unless offset by positive developments, such as a trade deal.

Historical Lessons: When the Fed Got It Wrong
History offers cautionary tales of Federal Reserve decisions that exacerbated economic challenges, underscoring the risks of premature or misaligned policy moves. One notable example is the Fed’s actions in the late 1970s, which contributed to the stagflation crisis of that era.

In the late 1970s, under Chairman Arthur Burns, the Fed underestimated the persistence of inflation driven by oil price shocks and expansive fiscal policies. Instead of tightening monetary policy decisively, the Fed oscillated between rate hikes and cuts, trying to balance employment and price stability. By 1978, inflation had climbed to 9%, and the Fed’s reluctance to sustain high rates allowed inflationary expectations to become entrenched. This forced Paul Volcker, Burns’ successor, to implement draconian rate hikes in 1979–1982, pushing the federal funds rate to 20% and triggering a severe recession with unemployment peaking at 10.8%. The Volcker era ultimately tamed inflation, but the delay in addressing it earlier led to prolonged economic pain, including a double-dip recession.

This historical misstep is relevant today as the Fed faces a similar dilemma: rising inflation risks from Trump’s tariffs and a solid but cooling labor market. Premature rate cuts now could mirror the 1970s error, allowing tariff-driven inflation to spiral and requiring harsher measures later. The Fed’s current pause reflects a lesson learned: patience in the face of inflationary threats is critical to avoid destabilizing expectations.

The Right Decision: Prudence Amid Global Uncertainty
The Fed’s decision to hold rates steady is a prudent move given the unprecedented uncertainty in the global economic environment, particularly driven by Trump’s erratic trade policies. One clear example of this uncertainty is the ongoing tariff rollout, which has disrupted supply chains and clouded the economic outlook. Since January 2025, Trump’s 10% global tariffs and 145% duties on Chinese imports have led to a surge in import costs, with U.S. GDP shrinking unexpectedly last quarter due to preemptive import rushes. Business surveys, such as those from the Institute for Supply Management, report “widespread alarm” over price hikes and supply chain chaos, with domestic producers raising prices opportunistically.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell emphasized that the central bank needs “greater clarity” before adjusting policy, noting that tariffs could cause either a “one-time” price spike or more persistent inflation, depending on their duration and retaliation from trading partners. With inflation at 2.3% headline and 2.6% core (above the Fed’s 2% target) and unemployment at 4.2%, the economy is not yet in distress but faces risks of stagflation—a scenario Powell acknowledged could complicate the Fed’s dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment.

By holding rates, the Fed avoids the risk of cutting too soon, which could fuel inflation if tariffs persist, or tightening prematurely, which could choke growth if unemployment rises sharply. This wait-and-see approach is supported by economists like Michael Feroli of J.P. Morgan, who argue that the Fed is “well positioned to wait” given the economy’s resilience. The single projected rate cut for 2025 reflects a cautious easing path, allowing the Fed to respond to clearer data on tariffs, trade negotiations, or labor market trends.

A Potential Trade Deal Teaser from Trump
Adding intrigue to the economic outlook, President Trump teased the possibility of a “major” trade deal on May 8, 2025, which could ease some of the tariff-related pressures weighing on markets. Posts on X and Reuters reports indicate that Trump hinted at negotiations with trading partners, potentially softening the impact of his “Liberation Day” tariffs announced earlier in 2025. Such a deal could reduce import costs, alleviate supply chain strains, and boost market confidence, particularly in tariff-sensitive sectors like technology and consumer goods.

However, Trump’s history of erratic policy shifts—such as backtracking on firing Powell or delaying tariffs on Canada and Mexico—suggests that markets will remain skeptical until concrete agreements materialize. If a deal is announced, it could provide a short-term lift to equities and commodities, though the Fed is unlikely to alter its cautious stance without sustained evidence of lower inflation.

No Rate Cut, One Planned
The Federal Reserve’s decision to hold interest rates steady on May 7, 2025, reflects a strategic pause amid rising inflation risks, tariff-driven uncertainty, and a resilient labor market. For markets, this means prolonged high borrowing costs, choppy equities, and a stronger dollar, with investors closely watching for signs of stagflation or trade relief. Historical missteps, like the Fed’s dithering in the 1970s, highlight the dangers of premature easing in an inflationary environment, reinforcing the wisdom of the current stance.

By waiting for clarity on Trump’s trade policies and their economic fallout, the Fed is making a prudent choice, as evidenced by the chaotic impact of tariffs on supply chains and prices. The single projected rate cut for 2025 underscores this caution. Meanwhile, Trump’s tease of a potential trade deal today could offer a glimmer of hope, but markets will demand substance over rhetoric. As the Fed navigates this high-stakes environment, its steady hand provides stability, even as the path ahead remains fraught with uncertainty.

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.